A vegetarian diet is key to personal health and population control

January 13, 2015

Dear Zenith News:


In regards to Tom Roark’s December 23 story, “Garret Hardin’s population dilemma” [Faces of Wisdom], please consider: As long as we have an animal-based diet we have twin population explosions. It seems it would be the first duty of a person who talks population control to eat a vegetarian diet as well as encourage others. Not a bad idea for proponents of families either since a whole foods vegetarian diet is considered to be like health insurance.  


Thank you, Mr. Roark, for your thoughtful stories and drawings.
 
Karen Moore
Duluth


Tom Roark replies: I’ve heard or read that switching to a vegetarian diet is more helpful than driving a Prius. There are people who claim, on the other hand, that ecologically raised meat is less costly and results in fewer animal deaths than a vegetarian diet that’s based on commodity crops.


I don’t know. I’m inclined towards the latter view, but I don’t eat meat because I don’t have the ecological option. What I really, really believe is that one’s ecological footprint is proportional to their wealth—period.


But you still get into the dilemma Hardin raises. Wes Jackson put the dilemma differently: If you conserve, you make the bidding easier for those who don’t conserve. I’m with Hardin. Society needs to examine this stuff thoroughly and honestly, then enforce the conclusions.
 

Please reload

More from this Author

Archives by Date

Please reload

Archives by Title or Author